veel natuke teemakohast
In fact, if you met a man, and he told you that he’d only ever had two lovers, you might congratulate him on his morals, but you can’t tell me you wouldn’t experience a very quick moment of “holy shit! really?!” Then compare that to a woman who says the same; do you think you’d have the same reaction? Honestly? Even in this day and age, I still feel like the sexuality of a woman is more acceptable, but only if it’s within certain boundaries. You can sleep with men before you get married, but not too many.
/—/
Look, you have two options in life: you can sit around and judge every last aspect of your life, including sex, which I deeply believe will turn you into a crazy person who organizes pieces of string for hours (see: Martha Stewart), or you can say, “I don’t have to qualify or examine the experience I am about to have. I can just have it, and it doesn’t have to mean anything more than me learning about myself.” There’s nothing wrong with learning more about yourself through your sexuality, but you as a human diminish yourself when you try to explain the experience in socially-acceptable terms.
Allikas: Toy With Me, «You are not bi. You are just a slut», autor The Kinky Jew
See on TÄPSELT see, millest ma rääkinud olen. Ja millest Birx rääkinud on (tal on suur teooria selle nn «biseksuaalsuse» kohta). Ja millest mina rääkinud olen ja praegu ka kogu see walk of shame’i teema on: et justkui on okei, et naine on seksuaalne, aga ta ei tohi olla LIIGA seksuaalne. Sa võid magada meestega, aga mitte LIIGA PALJUDE meestega, sest see pole sotsiaalselt aktsepteeritav.
Sellele ülaltoodud näitele tooks ma veel vastandnäite ka. Et kui mees ütleb, et ta on maganud 30 naisega, siis sa pigem ei mõista teda hukka. Aga kui naine ütleb, et ta on maganud 30 mehega, siis sa pigem mõistad teda hukka.
Aga see artikkel on väga eluterve ja ma kirjutan sealöeldud mõtetele alla. Üleanalüüsimine on uus must.
